3. Creeds and dogma

Introduction
Christianity is one of the few religions to have defined a credo (from the Latin for “I believe”), being a statement of creed enunciating core beliefs, which are declared orally. Its acceptance (and pronouncement) was a decisive factor in Christianity. The Credo was concluded following extensive debates in the first centuries, while development continued on dogma (doctrines proposed by the Church as divinely revealed).
Source 1

The Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381)

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father; by whom all things were made; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, and was made man; he was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered, and was buried, and the third day he rose again, according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father; from thence he shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.
And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified, who spake by the prophets. In one holy catholic and apostolic Church; we acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.


The Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381). Trans. Philip Schaff, Creeds of Christendom, vol. 1. Additions to the Nicene Creed are in italics.


The Council of Constantinople produced a creed, which is a set of formulas summarizing the Christian faith. While it is attributed to the Council, no act was left, and no contemporaneous document was found, attesting to its existence. It only appeared as a creed in the acts of the Council of Chalcedon of 451. Some scholars have questioned whether its text originated at Constantinople, yet they generally agree that the Credo, as it is known, was originally stated somehow at that council. The Credo preserved key elements defined at the Council of Nicaea (321), including the tenet on the consubstantial nature of Christ’s divinity. On this point, the object was to reaffirm (especially against Arius) that the Son is “of one substance” with the Father, and not “created”. The term was new and especially it was absent from the Scriptures. Nevertheless, it was adopted by a majority of the bishops at Nicea. The Credo also differed on some points with the Nicene Creed: among others, it developed on the Holy Spirit and proclaimed its divinity. The Council did not then state that the Spirit proceeds from the Son (in addition to the Father). The question [(Filioque)] surfaced later within Latin Christianity, becoming an issue of dispute between the Latin and Greek Churches. At the close of the 6th century in Spain, the Credo was altered to state that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The change was generalized in the West under the action of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charlemagne, and at the beginning of the 11th century, the Pope consented to it. Greek Christianity has rejected it until today. The Credo was originally written in the first person plural (“We”); only later was it expressed in the first person singular (“I”), in order to reinforce the individual character of the confession.

Source 2

The ecumenical councils

Ecumenical Council Year Principal themes/outcome
Nicaea I 325 Repudiated Arianism
Constantinople I 381 Confirmation of the Council Nicaea
Ephesus 431 Condemned Nestorianism
Chalcedon 451 Adopted dyophysitism
Constantinople II, III 553
680-681
Repudiated Nestorian influences.
Nicaea II 787 Repudiated Byzantine iconoclasm
Constantinople IV 869-870 Schism by the patriarch Photius condemned
Lateran I, II, III, IV 1123, 1139, 1179, 1215 Settling of the Investiture Controversy. Western Church reform. Heresies condemned (Waldensians, Cathars). Eucharistic doctrine defined.
Lyon I, II 1245, 1274 Deposition of the Holy Roman Emperor Frederic II. Union with the Eastern Churches.
Vienne 1311-1312 Dissolution of the Knights Templar. Reform of the mendicant orders.
Constance 1414-1418 Resolution of the Western Schism. Condemnation of Wycliffe and Hus.
Basel, Ferrara, Florence, Rome 1431-1445 Reunion with the Eastern Churches.
Lateran V 1512-1517 Reform of the clergy, approval of the Concordat of Bologna with Francis I of France
Trent 1545-1563 Reform of the Catholic Church
Vatican I 1869-1870 Faith and reason. Papal primacy and infallibility.
Vatican II 1962-1965 Revival of the Catholic Church. Religious liberty.

Table made by Anna Van den Kerchove.

Source 3

Apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus

By the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own authority, we pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.

The Apostolic constitution, whose Latin title means "The most munificent God", established the dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary. It references the previous dogma, defined in 1854, of the Immaculate Conception. To define the new dogma, Pope Pius XII (r. 1939-1958) referred to the authority of Jesus Christ, that invested in Peter and Paul and which all popes have claimed as their legitimate successors in line. It was the first time (and the only one to date) that the Pope brought into play papal infallibility – a dogma defined in 1870, which holds that the Pope is preserved from erring in exercising his office ex cathedra, that is to say, when he defines a doctrine by calling on his supreme teaching and apostolic authority.
The dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary, which was defined at a late stage in the Catholic Church (it is not recognized by other Christian denominations), is based on an ancient belief that Mary did not undergo a physical death and was raised directly to heaven. In the four canonical Gospels, nothing is said about the end of the life of Mary. Nonetheless, indications are found in “apocryphal” writings known as Transitus Mariae, the earliest of which date from the late 5th century, though they were probably tied to a tradition going further back to the 2nd century. The writings, though rejected (especially in the West), played a role in Greek liturgy, inspiring the Dormition of the Theotokos (the falling asleep of the Mother of God) feasted on August 15 by the Orthodox. In the West, the Feast of the Assumption was gradually instated as well, also on August 15. While both feasts share common points, they are not identical: the Orthodox tradition holds that the Virgin Mary did undergo a physical death; moreover, the Feast of the Assumption was brought in relation with the Immaculate Conception, which has been rejected as a dogma in the East. It should be noted that, in the dogma of the Assumption, the Pope used the equivocal phrase "having completed the course of her earthly life", taking no position on the reality of the Virgin Mary’s death. The Assumption as a belief inspired many artists.

Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus (November 1, 1950), 44. Retrieved from : http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/.._munificentissimus-deus_en.html (08/12/2014)